Equations and inequalities: 1st/2nd degree, systems, absolute value
- Solve a first- and second-degree equation or inequality - Solve a linear system in two unknowns - Solve an equation or inequality involving absolute value
Lesson
A first-degree equation () always has a unique solution . An inequality is solved the same way, with one detail that changes everything: multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the direction of the inequality.
For the second degree , the discriminant gives the number of real solutions: two if , one (double) if , none if . When they exist, the solutions are . For a second-degree inequality, the sign of the trinomial between the roots (if any) is opposite to the sign of , and outside the roots it matches the sign of .
A system of two linear equations in two unknowns is solved by substitution (isolate a variable in one equation and substitute it into the other) or by elimination (add/subtract multiples of the equations to cancel a variable). Both methods give the same result; the choice is a matter of efficiency given the coefficients.
The absolute value represents a distance from zero: () is equivalent to OR . For an inequality, is equivalent to , whereas is equivalent to OR — never confuse these two structures.
Illustration: sign chart for a rational inequality
Calculation: solving a rational inequality
A 3-step method: (1) move everything to one side to compare against 0; (2) locate the critical values (roots of the numerator and of the denominator); (3) test the sign of the expression on each interval bounded by those values.
Example: solve . Critical values: (numerator zero) and (denominator zero, forbidden value). Testing each interval: for (< −1): ; for (between −1 and 2): ; for (> 2): . The solution is — note that stays excluded even though the inequality is non-strict, since it makes the expression undefined, while is included because it only zeroes out the numerator.
Classic IMAT trap: in an inequality of the form , never multiply directly by without knowing its sign — the inequality flips if . Always reduce to a comparison against 0 first instead. Same logic for a quadratic inequality like : the roots and split the line into 3 intervals, and since the parabola opens upward, the expression is negative only between its roots — solution .
Key concepts
- Discriminant and number of real roots
- Sign of a second-degree trinomial
- Substitution vs elimination for a system
- (interval) vs (union of two half-lines)
Formulas
- Sum of roots: — Product of roots:
- ()
Intuitive explanation
The discriminant "announces", before any calculation, how many times the parabola crosses the x-axis: twice, once (tangent), or never. Visualizing the parabola avoids a lot of sign errors on second-degree inequalities.
Common IMAT pitfalls
Forgetting to reverse the direction of an inequality when dividing by a negative number is mistake number one. For the second degree, a common error is assuming the trinomial is always positive between the roots — it's the opposite when . For absolute values, mixing up the "interval" form and the "union" form is very common under time pressure.
Practice questions
IMAT-style questions
Comments
No comments yet — be the first.